Efectos de la capacidad metacognitiva, el nivel académico y el género sobre la creatividad científica en estudiantes de educación secundaria

Lucía Bonilla-Pellicer, Joan J. Solaz-Portolés, Vicente Sanjosé


El objetivo de este estúdio fue investigar los efectos de la capacidad metacognitiva, el nivel de formación académica y el género sobre la creatividad científica de los estudiantes de secundaria. Han participado 135 estudiantes de secundaria, 63 chicos y 72 chicas. A todos ellos se lês han administrado dos cuestionarios, uno de destrezas metacognitivas y uno de creatividad científica. De las correlaciones de Pearson entre variables y del análisis de regresión efectuado se puede concluir que la formación académica es la variable que más contribuye a lacreatividad científica, aunque explica um porcentaje de varianza muy pequeno.


Creatividad científica. Destrezas metacognitivas. Nivel académico. Género. Educación Secundaria.

Texto completo:

PDF (Español)


ABRAHAM, A. Genderand creativity: an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, v. 10, n. 2, p. 609-618, 2016.

AKTAMIS, H.; ERGIN, Ö. The effect of scientific process skills educationon students' scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements. Asia-Pacific Forumon Science Learning and Teaching, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2008.

BLAMIRES, M.; PETERSON, A. Can creativity be assessed? Towards an evidence-informed framework for assessing and planning progress in creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, v. 44, n. 2, p. 147-162, 2014.

BODEN, M. Creativity & knowledge. In: CRAFT, A.; JEFFERY, B; LEIBLING, M. (Eds.). Creativity in education. London: London Continuum Publishing, 2001, p. 95-102.

M. BOEKAERTS, M.; CASCALLAR, E. How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, v. 18, n. 3, p. 199–210, 2006.

CHARYTON, C.; SNELBECKER, G. E. General, artisticandscientificcreativityattributes of engineeringand music students. CreativityResearchJournal, v. 19, n. 2-3, p. 213-225, 2007.

DEHAAN, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, v. 8, n. 3, p. 172-181, 2009.

EPSTEIN, R. S. Cognition, Creativity, and Behavior: Selected Essays. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996.

EPSTEIN, R. S; SCHMIDT, M.; WARFEL, R. Measuring and training creativity competencies: validation of a new test. Creativity Research. Journal, vol.20, n. 1, p. 7-12, 2008.

FELDMAN, D. H.; BENJAMIN, A. C. Creativity and education: An American retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, v. 36, n. 3, p. 319-336, 2006.

GARDNER, H. Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York: Harper Collins, 1993.

HARGROVE, R. A.; NIETFELD, J. L. (2015) The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on Creative Problem Solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, v. 83, n. 3, p. 291-318, 2015.

HU, W.; ADEY, P. A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, v. 24, n. 4, p., 389-403, 2002

JAUŠOVEC, N. Metacognition in creative problem solving. In: RUNCO, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity research. Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, 1994, p.77-95.

JEFFREY, B.; CRAFT, A. Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, v. 30, n. 1, p. 77 –87, 2004.

KIND, P.M.; KIND, V. Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1–37, 2007.

KOZBELT, A.; BEGHETTO, R. A.; RUNCO, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In: KAUFMAN, J; STERNBERG, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 20-47.

LEE, M. K.; ERDOGAN, I. The effect of science–technology–society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, v. 29, n. 11, p. 1315-1327, 2007.

NEWTON, L. D.; NEWTON, D. P. (2014). Creativity in 21 st-century education. Prospects, v. 44, n. 4, p. 575-589, 2014.

OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION. Expect the unexpected: Developing creativity in primary and secondary schools. London: HMSO, 2003.

PESUT, D. J. Creative thinking as a self-regulatory metacognitive process: A model for education, training and further research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, v. 24, n. 2, p. 105–110, 1990.

SAHLBERG, P. Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, v. 11, n. 1, p. 45-61, 2010.

SCHRAW, G.; CRIPPEN, K. J.; HARTLEY, K. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, v. 36, n. 1-2, p. 111-139, 2006.

SHARMA, N. (2015). Scientific creativity in relation to cognitive style and achievement in Science of secondaryschoolstudents. Educational Quest-An International Journal of EducationandApplied Social Sciences, v. 6, n. 1, p. 25-29, 2015.

SHARP, C. Developing Young Children's Creativity: what can we learn from research? Topic, v. 32, p. 5-12, 2004.

SPERLING, R. A.; HOWARD, B. C.; MILLER, L. A.; MURPHY, C. Measures of children's knowled geand regulation of cognition. ContemporaryEducationalPsychology, v. 27, n. 1, p. 51-79, 2002.

TABACH, M.; FRIEDLANDER, A. School mathematics and creativity at the elementary and middle-grade levels: how are they related? ZDM, v. 45, n. 2, p. 227-238, 2013.

VAN DER STEL, M.; VEENMAN, M. V.; DEELEN, K.; HAENEN, J. Thein creasingrole of metacognitive skills in math: A cross-sectional study from a developmental perspective. ZDM, v. 42, n. 2, p. 219-229, 2010.

VEENMAN, M. V.; SPAANS, M. A. Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Ageand task differences. Learningand Individual Differences, v. 15, n. 2, p. 159-176, 2005.

YANG, K. K.; LIN, S. F.; HONG, Z. R.; LIN, H. S. Exploring the assessment of and relationship between elementary students’ scientific creativity and science inquiry. Creativity Research Journal, v. 28, n. 1, p. 16-23, 2016.


  • Não há apontamentos.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Rev.Int. de Pesq. em Didática das Ciências e Matemática (RevIn)

e-ISSN 2675-4258

Ano de fundação: 2020